Total Commodity Programs in South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,576
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in South Carolina totaled $61,419,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tolson Farms | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $259,468 |
22 | Satterwhite Farms LLC | Newberry, SC 29108 | $256,500 |
23 | Bentwood Farms LLC | Monroe, NC 28110 | $250,000 |
24 | Green Meadow Nursery LLC | Hollywood, SC 29449 | $250,000 |
25 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $248,176 |
26 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $241,892 |
27 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $226,512 |
28 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $224,887 |
29 | Larry Stephen Rabon | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $221,243 |
30 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $217,313 |
31 | Rouse Farms | Luray, SC 29932 | $212,331 |
32 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $212,288 |
33 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $206,319 |
34 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $197,294 |
35 | Frank & Cheryle Rogers | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $195,298 |
36 | W M Smith & Sons | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $191,131 |
37 | Willshire Farms Inc | Santee, SC 29142 | $190,031 |
38 | Dantzler Farms Part | Santee, SC 29142 | $190,012 |
39 | Infinger Farms Partnership | Saint George, SC 29477 | $188,039 |
40 | Mr Johnny Boyd Mcmillan | Lodge, SC 29082 | $182,872 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”