Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 113

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $3,494,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Haigler Farms PartnershipCameron, SC 29030$989,379
2Low Falls Wholesale NurseryCameron, SC 29030$259,868
3Hi Cotton Greenhouses LLCSaint Matthews, SC 29135$208,288
4Palmetto FarmsFort Motte, SC 29135$155,106
5Lyons Brothers FarmsElloree, SC 29047$106,661
6J & G Farms Sc LLCSt Matthews, SC 29135$99,506
7Jeffrey Legree KaiglerSwansea, SC 29160$94,996
8W M Smith & SonsSaint Matthews, SC 29135$89,786
9Perrow FarmsCameron, SC 29030$84,554
10K & R Farm LLCSt Matthews, SC 29135$75,530
11William C Holman JrCameron, SC 29030$67,016
12Delbert C InabinetOrangeburg, SC 29118$62,753
13Bates Houck FarmCameron, SC 29030$61,724
14Reed & Sons Farms LLCSt Matthews, SC 29135$61,076
15Harry L Ott JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$57,316
16Mary Lil WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$52,236
17Carson FarmsElloree, SC 29047$50,559
18Kendall WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$45,422
19Raymond StablerNorth, SC 29112$43,501
20Rawl Dargan Culclasure IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$41,289

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag