Tobacco Payment Program in Chesterfield County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Tobacco Payment Program from farms in Chesterfield County, South Carolina totaled $24,806 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Malcolm Byrd | Patrick, SC 29584 | $6,472 |
2 | Terry L Teal | Patrick, SC 29584 | $2,774 |
3 | Francis Stanley Byrd | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $2,284 |
4 | Maysel M Johnson | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $1,563 |
5 | Don & Charles Teal | Patrick, SC 29584 | $1,416 |
6 | Heyward L Walters | Patrick, SC 29584 | $1,330 |
7 | Joseph Delmas Freeman | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $1,220 |
8 | Steven H Walters | Patrick, SC 29584 | $1,088 |
9 | Donald Ray Teal | Patrick, SC 29584 | $939 |
10 | R Wayne Boatwright | Cheraw, SC 29520 | $761 |
11 | Erline G Teal | Patrick, SC 29584 | $593 |
12 | James T Teal Estate | Patrick, SC 29584 | $576 |
13 | William H Griggs | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $460 |
14 | Francis P Byrd Trust | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $310 |
15 | Charles Teal | Patrick, SC 29584 | $286 |
16 | R D King III | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $264 |
17 | Riverwood Farms | Lexington, NC 27292 | $226 |
18 | James Harvey Isgett | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $209 |
19 | Harold Raymond Byrd | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $197 |
20 | Lucas E Byrd | Patrick, SC 29584 | $173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>