Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 112
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $1,585,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jerry Lee Mcelveen Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $87,093 |
2 | Flowers Farms LLC | Summerton, SC 29148 | $83,074 |
3 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $72,689 |
4 | B & D Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $70,754 |
5 | Gamble Family Farms | New Zion, SC 29111 | $63,886 |
6 | Everett Farms | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $58,660 |
7 | S H Jackson Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $58,572 |
8 | Duckford Plantation Inc | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $57,316 |
9 | Cogdill Family Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $55,568 |
10 | John H Horton III | Manning, SC 29102 | $51,581 |
11 | Lester C Thompson III | Manning, SC 29102 | $49,276 |
12 | Double D Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $46,320 |
13 | David L Tindal Farms LLC | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $42,507 |
14 | Witherspoon Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $37,233 |
15 | Cecil Bozard Eaddy Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $36,397 |
16 | Moore Family Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $30,030 |
17 | Stevenson Carl Gamble Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $27,304 |
18 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $26,738 |
19 | Triple S Farms Of Sc, LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $26,600 |
20 | James Paul Eaddy | Manning, SC 29102 | $25,380 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>