Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $19,624 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Infinger Farms | Saint George, SC 29477 | $5,376 |
2 | Ham Bone Farm | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $5,024 |
3 | George Sanders | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $4,144 |
4 | Walters Hog Farm | Saint George, SC 29477 | $738 |
5 | William M Dangerfield | Moncks Corner, SC 29461 | $650 |
6 | Pinckney G Murray | Saint George, SC 29477 | $446 |
7 | Etholia Brown | Dorchester, SC 29437 | $420 |
8 | Timothy Boyd | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $352 |
9 | Zacheus Goodwine | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $320 |
10 | Virgil Boyd | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $310 |
11 | Mckinley Brown Jr | Saint George, SC 29477 | $310 |
12 | William H Murray | Saint George, SC 29477 | $257 |
13 | Ervin Capers | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $201 |
14 | Bobby Infinger | Saint George, SC 29477 | $170 |
15 | Clarence Simmons | Dorchester, SC 29437 | $170 |
16 | L A Gunter Farms | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $128 |
17 | James H Weathers | Saint George, SC 29477 | $94 |
18 | Fender Farms | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $86 |
19 | W Tolman Salisbury | Summerville, SC 29483 | $71 |
20 | Daniel L Mcalhaney | Branchville, SC 29432 | $57 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>