Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Laurens County, South Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 83
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Laurens County, South Carolina totaled $551,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Satterwhite Farms LLC | Newberry, SC 29108 | $34,020 |
2 | Don L Willis | Fountain Inn, SC 29644 | $31,322 |
3 | Heath C Copeland | Clinton, SC 29325 | $28,094 |
4 | Joe Ben Hunter III | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $20,529 |
5 | Stoddard's Oak Grove Farm | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $18,202 |
6 | W David Mcdannald | Fountain Inn, SC 29644 | $17,898 |
7 | Brandon Hurley | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $17,048 |
8 | Ross Stewart | Easley, SC 29642 | $14,744 |
9 | O Perry Earle III | Fountain Inn, SC 29644 | $13,582 |
10 | Walter Tim Caldwell | Enoree, SC 29335 | $12,281 |
11 | John M Simmons Jr | Mountville, SC 29370 | $12,187 |
12 | David R Coggins | Mountville, SC 29370 | $11,636 |
13 | Jerry Wayne Darby | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $11,514 |
14 | Don Rackley | Clinton, SC 29325 | $11,346 |
15 | William Lewis Croxton | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $10,962 |
16 | Thomas H Coggins Sr | Laurens, SC 29360 | $10,843 |
17 | William C Hunter Jr | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $10,469 |
18 | Wayne S Womble | Clinton, SC 29325 | $10,216 |
19 | Wesley C Knight | Waterloo, SC 29384 | $10,077 |
20 | Curtis Childress | Laurens, SC 29360 | $8,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>