Farm Subsidy information

Lee County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Lee County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,700

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lee County, South Carolina totaled $204,684,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21M & T Farms IncBishopville, SC 29010$1,510,579
22Whit PlayerElliott, SC 29046$1,461,162
23Sarah G MozingoBishopville, SC 29010$1,457,312
24William K Phillips JrLynchburg, SC 29080$1,400,835
25Timothy J BarnesBishopville, SC 29010$1,336,885
26William S McelveenBishopville, SC 29010$1,317,057
27Betty S AtkinsonMayesville, SC 29104$1,283,251
28Samuel D WardBishopville, SC 29010$1,270,524
29King Brothers FarmBishopville, SC 29010$1,242,556
30Tomlinson Farms Of Lynchburg LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$1,212,218
31Welsh Farms LLCBishopville, SC 29010$1,209,775
32Pondville FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$1,143,059
33David P AtkinsonLynchburg, SC 29080$1,112,346
34Pete BeasleyBishopville, SC 29010$1,038,629
35Billy BentonHartsville, SC 29550$1,037,686
36Elfreeda W BarnesBishopville, SC 29010$1,032,206
37Dog Island Farms IncBishopville, SC 29010$1,029,295
38K & J EnterprisesMayesville, SC 29104$1,029,175
39Agriservices Inc Of The Pee DeeHartsville, SC 29550$1,021,447
40William A Tomlinson SrLynchburg, SC 29080$1,010,792

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag