Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Marlboro County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Marlboro County, South Carolina totaled $792,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
1Oneal BrosBlenheim, SC 29516$98,413
2Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$81,483
3Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$60,098
4Douglas H & Margaret H NewtonClio, SC 29525$44,533
5Joseph P Hodges JrBennettsville, SC 29512$42,450
6F Stewart NewtonBennettsville, SC 29512$39,625
7E M OtuelBennettsville, SC 29512$30,581
8Z V Pate IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$30,522
9Lee FarmsBennettsville, SC 29512$29,382
10Jonas T KennedyBennettsville, SC 29512$21,357
11L & J FarmsBennettsville, SC 29512$19,753
12E Michael Otuel IIIBennettsville, SC 29512$18,574
13C Douglas OtuelBennettsville, SC 29512$18,572
14Freddy C WebsterBlenheim, SC 29516$17,280
15Margaret M EnglishClio, SC 29525$16,900
16Robert L Griggs SrBennettsville, SC 29512$16,089
17Gordon P HudginsBennettsville, SC 29512$14,810
18Francis M Hinson IIIBennettsville, SC 29512$14,251
19Clarence Mack HelmsBennettsville, SC 29512$13,027
20Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$12,646

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag