Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sumter County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sumter County, South Carolina totaled $34,951 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William Richard Mcleod Sr | Sumter, SC 29150 | $13,214 |
2 | Neverdun Farms LLC | Sumter, SC 29154 | $4,157 |
3 | Michael R Sykes | Florence, SC 29501 | $2,608 |
4 | William R Mcleod Jr | Sumter, SC 29150 | $1,949 |
5 | Sans Souci Farm LLC | Sumter, SC 29154 | $1,811 |
6 | Braddock Farms LLC | Camden, SC 29020 | $1,392 |
7 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $1,344 |
8 | Richard Pinckney Jr | Rembert, SC 29128 | $1,030 |
9 | Martin Farms | Sumter, SC 29153 | $867 |
10 | Sumpter & Associates LLC | Sumter, SC 29150 | $759 |
11 | Gary Roberson | Sumter, SC 29150 | $698 |
12 | Debra L Fisher | Sumter, SC 29153 | $651 |
13 | Lawrance Lasseigne | Sumter, SC 29153 | $546 |
14 | Brogdon Family Farms | Manning, SC 29102 | $535 |
15 | Dustin Donald Poplin | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $491 |
16 | Patrick Pearson | Sumter, SC 29153 | $462 |
17 | H Everette Harrington | Sumter, SC 29153 | $336 |
18 | Katherine L Mccaskill | Rembert, SC 29128 | $336 |
19 | Lc Properties Of Sumter LLC | Sumter, SC 29153 | $283 |
20 | Thomas Allen Newman | Sumter, SC 29153 | $274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>