Farm Subsidy information
South Dakota
Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 107,736
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $23,870,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Evergreen Colony | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $4,082,884 |
82 | Spink Hutterian Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $4,077,669 |
83 | Hillside Hutterian Brethren | Doland, SD 57436 | $4,058,518 |
84 | Millerdale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Miller, SD 57362 | $4,049,221 |
85 | Rolland Hutterian Brethren Inc | White, SD 57276 | $4,020,747 |
86 | Hansmeier & Son Inc | Bristol, SD 57219 | $4,007,838 |
87 | P Spear Ranch Inc | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $4,001,595 |
88 | Cowan Ranch Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $3,963,410 |
89 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $3,963,049 |
90 | Pembrook Hutt Brethren | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $3,957,720 |
91 | Mhc Land And Cattle Ltd Dba Christiansen Land & C | Kimball, SD 57355 | $3,934,633 |
92 | Orland Hutterian Brethren | Montrose, SD 57048 | $3,905,110 |
93 | Clearfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Delmont, SD 57330 | $3,902,631 |
94 | Noethlich Bros | Doland, SD 57436 | $3,864,009 |
95 | Alan J Gross | Blunt, SD 57522 | $3,862,314 |
96 | Angela K Gross | Blunt, SD 57522 | $3,798,447 |
97 | Lakeview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $3,779,917 |
98 | Oberlander Farms | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $3,774,935 |
99 | Riggs Farms Inc | Ethan, SD 57334 | $3,770,687 |
100 | Koeck Brothers | St Lawrence, SD 57373 | $3,764,988 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”