Farm Subsidy information

South Dakota

Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 103,000

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $20,862,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Sd Building AuthoritySioux Falls, SD 57117$31,039,351
2Yackley RanchesOnida, SD 57564$12,841,192
3River View FarmsPlatte, SD 57369$11,237,682
4Wittler Joint VentureOnida, SD 57564$10,094,316
5Three B Farms PartnershipGettysburg, SD 57442$9,396,081
6Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$9,274,231
7Mike Ogan Farms PartnershipPierre, SD 57501$9,150,264
8Kenneth R Huse & SonsOnida, SD 57564$8,946,990
9Lindskov Ranch Gen PtrIsabel, SD 57633$7,766,074
10Kjerstad Farm PartnershipQuinn, SD 57775$7,512,646
11Locken FarmsBath, SD 57427$7,427,562
12Lower Brule Farm CorpFort Pierre, SD 57532$7,291,791
13Mayclin Farms PartnershipPlankinton, SD 57368$7,105,137
14Buhler & Buhler EnterprisesOnida, SD 57564$6,336,671
15Mundt BrothersAgar, SD 57520$6,118,809
16Peterson FarmsHitchcock, SD 57348$6,065,307
17Sisseton-wahpeton OyateAgency Village, SD 57262$6,034,422
18Swenson PartnershipWessington Springs, SD 57382$5,768,874
19Lnl PartnershipPierre, SD 57501$5,735,626
20Jes Farms PartnershipPierre, SD 57501$5,547,081

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag