Farm Subsidy information
South Dakota
Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 107,736
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $23,870,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Glendale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $4,556,626 |
62 | Rosedale Hutterian Brethren Incor | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,497,292 |
63 | Kyle Gross | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $4,490,496 |
64 | Randall Ag Ventures | Canistota, SD 57012 | $4,474,595 |
65 | Westwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $4,469,696 |
66 | Spring Valley Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $4,415,251 |
67 | Kroeplin Farms General Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $4,403,107 |
68 | Bixler Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $4,383,457 |
69 | Cedar Grove Hutt Breth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $4,313,817 |
70 | Newport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $4,310,219 |
71 | Ireland Brothers | Martin, SD 57551 | $4,294,103 |
72 | John Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $4,278,681 |
73 | Pugh Bros | Miller, SD 57362 | $4,272,437 |
74 | Wayne Simon & Jerad Simon Ptrs | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $4,168,511 |
75 | Schlechter Farms | Orient, SD 57467 | $4,165,222 |
76 | Blooming Valley Grain Farms Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $4,124,239 |
77 | Sunset Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $4,122,516 |
78 | Wade & Michelle Jones Partnership | Harrold, SD 57536 | $4,107,066 |
79 | Riverside Hutterian Brethren Inc | Huron, SD 57350 | $4,095,340 |
80 | Greenwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Delmont, SD 57330 | $4,083,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”