Counter Cyclical Program in South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 32,379

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $244,231,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2021
41Rolland Hutterian Brethren IncWhite, SD 57276$126,652
42Jamesville Hutterian Brethren IncUtica, SD 57067$126,165
43Clarmont Hutterian Brethren IncCastlewood, SD 57223$125,474
44Orland Hutterian BrethrenMontrose, SD 57048$125,429
45Arne SvarstadAberdeen, SD 57401$125,046
46Rockport Hutterian Brethren IncAlexandria, SD 57311$124,334
47Wolf Creek Hutterian BrethernOlivet, SD 57052$123,566
48Millbrook Hutterian Brethren IncMitchell, SD 57301$123,275
49Nathan N LaknessHayti, SD 57241$123,124
50Logan Hutterian Brethren IncRaymond, SD 57258$122,114
51William J KadounBritton, SD 57430$121,616
52D & M PartnershipAmherst, SD 57421$121,444
53Armadale Farms IncMellette, SD 57461$121,008
54Harry Pharis JrGroton, SD 57445$120,644
55Treeby Farm PartnershipHecla, SD 57446$120,463
56Cal & Mary HayengaAndover, SD 57422$120,312
57Gengerke Farms IncGroton, SD 57445$119,807
58Penrhos Farms IncBritton, SD 57430$119,770
59Clearfield Hutterian Brethren IncDelmont, SD 57330$119,401
60Triple D Farms IncHecla, SD 57446$118,906

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag