Conservation Reserve Program in South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,103
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $131,826,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sisseton-wahpeton Oyate | Agency Village, SD 57262 | $573,339 |
| 2 | Lower Brule Wildlife Dept | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $291,767 |
| 3 | , | $177,928 | |
| 4 | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $174,564 |
| 5 | Elm Creek Farms | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $144,814 |
| 6 | Mitchell-broadview Llp | Malibu, CA 90265 | $129,417 |
| 7 | River View Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $109,732 |
| 8 | Kingbrook Rural Water System Inc | Arlington, SD 57212 | $102,346 |
| 9 | Trask Ranch Partnership | Wasta, SD 57791 | $100,000 |
| 10 | Roseth Bros | Midland, SD 57552 | $99,010 |
| 11 | Bailey Farms Gen Prtn | Watauga, SD 57660 | $98,442 |
| 12 | Ross & Janice Williams Jv | Philip, SD 57567 | $98,168 |
| 13 | Craig & Kirk Schaunaman | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $97,460 |
| 14 | Mary L Langbehn | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $88,728 |
| 15 | Strouckel Brothers | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $86,666 |
| 16 | Brian Burke | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $85,220 |
| 17 | R & M Rose Ranch | Hayes, SD 57537 | $84,462 |
| 18 | Swanson Real Estate Limited Partnership II | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $84,020 |
| 19 | Tgfm Land Ptn | Pierre, SD 57501 | $83,253 |
| 20 | R & D Marshall | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $80,528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
