Direct Payment Program in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 47,819
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $1,571,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sumption Farms | Frederick, SD 57441 | $521,615 |
62 | Bottolfson Brothers | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $518,998 |
63 | Pravecek Bros | Colome, SD 57528 | $514,510 |
64 | Buhler & Buhler Enterprises | Onida, SD 57564 | $508,760 |
65 | Vernon Amick & Sons | Letcher, SD 57359 | $507,776 |
66 | Warriner Eugene/joan | Blunt, SD 57522 | $502,700 |
67 | Priebe Ag Ptn | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $498,908 |
68 | Clements Farms | Miller, SD 57362 | $495,168 |
69 | Diamond Ring Farm | Midland, SD 57552 | $494,641 |
70 | Kinkler Farm Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $491,783 |
71 | Page Brothers | De Smet, SD 57231 | $487,405 |
72 | Ireland Brothers | Martin, SD 57551 | $486,364 |
73 | Rex & Leann Haskins Joint Venture | Pierre, SD 57501 | $483,873 |
74 | Bly Bros | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $482,179 |
75 | Koeck Brothers | St Lawrence, SD 57373 | $476,662 |
76 | Darwin Baloun Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $476,560 |
77 | Bev Svarstad | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $475,121 |
78 | Arne Svarstad | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $474,477 |
79 | Wagner Farms | Miller, SD 57362 | $472,564 |
80 | Hutterville South Dakota Inc | Stratford, SD 57474 | $470,100 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”