Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,362
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in South Dakota totaled $179,867,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Whetstone Valley Honey Inc | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $1,538,811 |
2 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $1,404,332 |
3 | Baysinger Honey Farm LLC | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $996,679 |
4 | Circle B Honey Farms Inc | Hazel, SD 57242 | $944,008 |
5 | Talbotts Honey LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $849,683 |
6 | Thomas Maxwell | Faith, SD 57626 | $739,677 |
7 | Hogan Honey Farms Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $706,819 |
8 | Strehlow Bees Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $690,062 |
9 | A H Meyer & Sons Inc | Winfred, SD 57076 | $659,711 |
10 | Black Bear Mountain Honey LLC | Sandy, OR 97055 | $619,974 |
11 | Tim W Hollmann | Dante, SD 57329 | $560,785 |
12 | Mary Kaye Gesinger | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $538,562 |
13 | Clint Hamilton | Hazel, SD 57242 | $502,088 |
14 | Steven J Tegantvoort | Gary, SD 57237 | $498,505 |
15 | Roger Hamilton | Hazel, SD 57242 | $481,218 |
16 | Cowan Ranch Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $467,386 |
17 | Fulton Scott Brown | Huron, SD 57350 | $456,776 |
18 | Topf Ranch | Faith, SD 57626 | $423,247 |
19 | Brandt Honey Producers LLC | Yankton, SD 57078 | $374,288 |
20 | Mary Beth Assman | Winner, SD 57580 | $367,320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>