Market Gains in South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,558
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in South Dakota totaled $189,376,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $1,082,896 |
2 | Harvey/andrea Sheehan | Pierre, SD 57501 | $769,215 |
3 | Swenson Brothers | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $700,089 |
4 | Peterson Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $583,981 |
5 | Berbos Farms | Port Charlotte, FL 33948 | $574,167 |
6 | Sylte Farms | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $512,266 |
7 | Racota Valley Ranch | Hazel, SD 57242 | $496,885 |
8 | Kopman Brothers | Bryant, SD 57221 | $441,764 |
9 | Foxley Brothers | Platte, SD 57369 | $422,510 |
10 | Locken Farms | Bath, SD 57427 | $409,247 |
11 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $391,715 |
12 | River View Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $372,296 |
13 | Buhler & Buhler Enterprises | Onida, SD 57564 | $370,509 |
14 | Hinckley Brothers Ptn | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $365,386 |
15 | Karels Farms Part | Milbank, SD 57252 | $362,893 |
16 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $350,744 |
17 | Reh Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $334,822 |
18 | Donald Paul Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $329,147 |
19 | Prairie River Farm Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $327,319 |
20 | Riggs Farms Inc | Ethan, SD 57334 | $320,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>