Direct Payment Program in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 779
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $14,304,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edmund Bernard Hanten Jr | White Lake, SD 57383 | $69,561 |
42 | Paul Eugene Matzner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $69,438 |
43 | Daniel George Hargreaves | Stickney, SD 57375 | $69,361 |
44 | Thompson Brothers | Letcher, SD 57359 | $69,059 |
45 | Curtis Alden Niewenhuis | Stickney, SD 57375 | $68,843 |
46 | Gregory Kroupa | White Lake, SD 57383 | $67,166 |
47 | Dale Hoffman | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $65,545 |
48 | Brian Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $65,089 |
49 | David Michael Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $64,633 |
50 | Carol Margaret Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $64,578 |
51 | Eric Joseph Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $64,392 |
52 | Daniel W Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $64,374 |
53 | Production Plus | White Lake, SD 57383 | $62,820 |
54 | Louis Matzner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $62,401 |
55 | William Earl Stange | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $60,472 |
56 | Tracy Vangorp | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $60,055 |
57 | John Allen Nydam | Stickney, SD 57375 | $59,256 |
58 | Thomas John Guenthner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $58,285 |
59 | Calvin A Berwald | Ogema, WI 54459 | $57,703 |
60 | Thomas Pavlin | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $57,441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”