Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 208
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $1,351,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lance Keizer | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $16,539 |
22 | Eric Assmus | Stickney, SD 57375 | $16,005 |
23 | Dennis Dwight Crago | Stickney, SD 57375 | $15,834 |
24 | William Earl Stange | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $14,542 |
25 | Kelvin Prien | Stickney, SD 57375 | $14,237 |
26 | James A Mccord | White Lake, SD 57383 | $13,923 |
27 | Thompson Farms | Letcher, SD 57359 | $13,530 |
28 | Randall Breukelman | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $12,724 |
29 | Jerry J Hettinger | White Lake, SD 57383 | $12,327 |
30 | Douglas Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $12,256 |
31 | Curtis James Plamp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $11,436 |
32 | Randall Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $11,208 |
33 | Dennis Beckmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $11,118 |
34 | Dave Beckmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $10,261 |
35 | John Arlyn Nydam | Stickney, SD 57375 | $9,636 |
36 | Robert Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $9,452 |
37 | Wayne Tatro | White Lake, SD 57383 | $8,837 |
38 | Daniel George Hargreaves | Stickney, SD 57375 | $8,738 |
39 | Bradley Hohbach | White Lake, SD 57383 | $7,478 |
40 | Corey Plamp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $7,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”