Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 329
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $12,075,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mayclin Farms Partnership | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,362,256 |
2 | Production Plus | White Lake, SD 57383 | $314,038 |
3 | Van Dusseldorp Ag Enterprises | Platte, SD 57369 | $262,951 |
4 | Curtis Leo Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $226,151 |
5 | Dennis Marlin Ashwill | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $224,395 |
6 | Louise Ann Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $208,753 |
7 | Joe Hoffman | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $192,261 |
8 | John Arlyn Nydam | Stickney, SD 57375 | $165,958 |
9 | Ronald L Glissendorf | White Lake, SD 57383 | $151,611 |
10 | Vernon Lee Niles | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $144,972 |
11 | Wayne Robert Klein | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $142,750 |
12 | Randy Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $137,091 |
13 | Paul Borgmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $135,910 |
14 | Jaylon Ralph Gerlach | Stickney, SD 57375 | $135,058 |
15 | Eric Joseph Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $134,494 |
16 | Daniel W Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $134,494 |
17 | Tracy Vangorp | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $132,410 |
18 | Randy Bormann | Stickney, SD 57375 | $129,952 |
19 | David Glen Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $128,508 |
20 | Laron Lee Gerlach | Stickney, SD 57375 | $126,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>