Farm Subsidy information
Bon Homme County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Bon Homme County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,655
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bon Homme County, South Dakota totaled $339,365,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren Inc | Tabor, SD 57063 | $4,853,060 |
2 | Steven Victor Cap | Scotland, SD 57059 | $1,822,354 |
3 | Guthmiller Farms Inc | Scotland, SD 57059 | $1,650,707 |
4 | Gerald L Dvoracek | Springfield, SD 57062 | $1,549,689 |
5 | Kenneth A Sayler | Tabor, SD 57063 | $1,541,418 |
6 | David Walloch | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $1,476,971 |
7 | Virgil Tjeerdsma | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $1,417,765 |
8 | Percy Tjeerdsma | Springfield, SD 57062 | $1,256,997 |
9 | Terry Ray Balvin | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $1,252,925 |
10 | Richard Mark Kreber | Springfield, SD 57062 | $1,198,091 |
11 | Brian Kozak | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $1,180,739 |
12 | Eugene James Cap | Tripp, SD 57376 | $1,155,201 |
13 | Martin Fredrick Kubal | Scotland, SD 57059 | $1,135,901 |
14 | Michael J Slama | Tabor, SD 57063 | $1,103,426 |
15 | Lee M Sayler | Scotland, SD 57059 | $1,101,988 |
16 | Frank J Pravecek | Scotland, SD 57059 | $1,097,954 |
17 | Gregory Mc Cann | Tabor, SD 57063 | $1,080,220 |
18 | Mr David Ray Dvoracek | Springfield, SD 57062 | $1,065,537 |
19 | John Vlcek | Tabor, SD 57063 | $1,054,820 |
20 | Mr Jeff Allan Deboer | Scotland, SD 57059 | $1,053,795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>