Conservation Reserve Program in Brule County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 166
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $493,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daniel A Conkling | Yankton, SD 57078 | $3,357 |
42 | Michael Mentzer | Miller, SD 57362 | $3,285 |
43 | Philip And Kari Lenz Family Rev Living Trust | Gretna, NE 68028 | $3,143 |
44 | Geppert Ranch LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $3,096 |
45 | Richard And Sharlene Duvall Living Trust - Richard | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $3,069 |
46 | Louis Janish Jr | Kimball, SD 57355 | $3,030 |
47 | Eileen L Kroupa - Eileen L Kroupa Revocable Living | Kimball, SD 57355 | $3,019 |
48 | Eastman Land Co LLC | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $2,814 |
49 | James Havlik | Madison, SD 57042 | $2,812 |
50 | Janice K Urban | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $2,757 |
51 | Nepodal Land & Cattle Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $2,713 |
52 | Darrel D Duvall | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $2,696 |
53 | Boesen Farm LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $2,696 |
54 | Renee Schaub | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $2,534 |
55 | Richard A Meier Trust | White Lake, SD 57383 | $2,518 |
56 | Margaret Galland | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $2,322 |
57 | Kenneth W Huether Jr | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $2,282 |
58 | Joan Goetsch | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $2,233 |
59 | Michael Stec | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $2,178 |
60 | Craig Swanson | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $2,033 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”