Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Brule County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 177
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $1,807,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kroupa Ranch LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $106,763 |
2 | Thomas J Ashley | Platte, SD 57369 | $42,593 |
3 | Kroupa Pukwana Cattle Llp | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $41,859 |
4 | Thompson Family Farms LLC | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $41,828 |
5 | Paul Giedd | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $39,766 |
6 | Charles Totton | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $39,346 |
7 | Justin Graves | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $37,897 |
8 | Brian Havlik | Kimball, SD 57355 | $33,795 |
9 | Rose L7 Ranch Inc | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $27,985 |
10 | R & R Cattle Co % Steve Reimer | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $27,601 |
11 | Kurt Thomas | Kimball, SD 57355 | $25,907 |
12 | Donald Heinrich | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $25,683 |
13 | Keith Richard Reuer | Reliance, SD 57569 | $25,091 |
14 | Scott Swanson | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $23,632 |
15 | Roger Randall | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $22,681 |
16 | Boesen Farm LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $22,148 |
17 | Matthew Swanson | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $22,016 |
18 | Holan Farms LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $21,956 |
19 | Douglas Konechne | Kimball, SD 57355 | $21,746 |
20 | Konechne Ranch LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $21,709 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>