Loan Deficiency in Brule County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 540
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $13,921,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert F Surat Sr | Academy, SD 57369 | $330,272 |
2 | Grass Ranch Hutt Breth Inc | Kimball, SD 57355 | $328,836 |
3 | Helen Christiansen | Kimball, SD 57355 | $312,812 |
4 | Olsen Farms Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $273,312 |
5 | Van Dusseldorp Ag Enterprises | Platte, SD 57369 | $265,168 |
6 | Timothy J Pazour | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $244,197 |
7 | Cedar Grove Hutt Breth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $182,186 |
8 | Norman Spreckels | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $178,268 |
9 | Christine Hamilton | Kimball, SD 57355 | $168,011 |
10 | Cedar Grove Hutt Beth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $150,013 |
11 | Brett A Surat | Kimball, SD 57355 | $139,000 |
12 | Philip Larson | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $136,038 |
13 | William Randall | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $129,186 |
14 | Edward Havlik | Kimball, SD 57355 | $123,458 |
15 | Steven Mairose | Kimball, SD 57355 | $122,542 |
16 | Olson Grain Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $119,254 |
17 | Nepodal & Sons Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $118,090 |
18 | Dale W Swanson | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $112,870 |
19 | Paul Giedd | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $112,667 |
20 | Barry Dean Swanson | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $109,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>