Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butte County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 232
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $948,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kudlock Ranch LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $7,778 |
22 | Dakota Ranches Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $7,690 |
23 | Dry Well Ranch | Mud Butte, SD 57758 | $7,603 |
24 | Timothy D Reich | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $7,521 |
25 | Kevin P Deschamps | Newell, SD 57760 | $7,438 |
26 | Debra Lee Deschamps | Newell, SD 57760 | $7,438 |
27 | Steve Schuldies | Nisland, SD 57762 | $6,847 |
28 | Daniel S Long | Waynesboro, PA 17268 | $6,832 |
29 | Bar 69 Angus Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $6,809 |
30 | Schmid Lazy K - Diamond LLC | Vale, SD 57788 | $6,771 |
31 | James L Hansen | Vale, SD 57788 | $6,767 |
32 | Christopher Kent Penner | Newell, SD 57760 | $6,568 |
33 | Johnson Sheep And Cattle LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $6,558 |
34 | T & S Mackey Farm LLC | Nisland, SD 57762 | $6,531 |
35 | Reid C Stranberg | Newell, SD 57760 | $6,432 |
36 | Richard Clayton Harrison | Fruitdale, SD 57717 | $6,320 |
37 | Shane E Mcgregor | Newell, SD 57760 | $6,262 |
38 | Kenneth Eide | Nisland, SD 57762 | $6,191 |
39 | Andrew H Jensen - Jensen Ranch | Newell, SD 57760 | $6,099 |
40 | Stanley Lewis | Nisland, SD 57762 | $6,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”