Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 123

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $2,079,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21Arpan Grazing Assoc IncNisland, SD 57762$25,114
22L & S Cattle Company LLCBelle Fourche, SD 57717$24,732
23Jeral V ShearBelle Fourche, SD 57717$24,724
24Rittberger Ranch IncNewell, SD 57760$24,616
25Harlan JacobsenNewell, SD 57760$22,852
26John F RocheColumbus, WI 53925$22,451
27Jerry Wayne EllerYadkinville, NC 27055$22,325
28Robert L ShearBelle Fourche, SD 57717$22,076
29Ww Thompson & Sons IncSpearfish, SD 57783$22,003
30Randal T ValleryNisland, SD 57762$21,436
31Ingodwe Perpetual TrustSpearfish, SD 57783$20,843
32Debbie E Van KleyBelle Fourche, SD 57717$20,839
33Ed A BakerNewell, SD 57760$20,027
34Arthur WalkerFruitdale, SD 57717$19,215
35Dale MormanSturgis, SD 57785$19,046
36Bob D LewisNisland, SD 57762$19,003
37Wendt Ranches IncNewell, SD 57760$17,790
38Tom DeyoeNewell, SD 57760$17,686
39J H Welling TrustChadron, NE 69337$17,632
40Jeff HormanBelle Fourche, SD 57717$17,557

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag