Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 123
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $2,079,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Arpan Grazing Assoc Inc | Nisland, SD 57762 | $25,114 |
22 | L & S Cattle Company LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $24,732 |
23 | Jeral V Shear | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $24,724 |
24 | Rittberger Ranch Inc | Newell, SD 57760 | $24,616 |
25 | Harlan Jacobsen | Newell, SD 57760 | $22,852 |
26 | John F Roche | Columbus, WI 53925 | $22,451 |
27 | Jerry Wayne Eller | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $22,325 |
28 | Robert L Shear | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $22,076 |
29 | Ww Thompson & Sons Inc | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $22,003 |
30 | Randal T Vallery | Nisland, SD 57762 | $21,436 |
31 | Ingodwe Perpetual Trust | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $20,843 |
32 | Debbie E Van Kley | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $20,839 |
33 | Ed A Baker | Newell, SD 57760 | $20,027 |
34 | Arthur Walker | Fruitdale, SD 57717 | $19,215 |
35 | Dale Morman | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $19,046 |
36 | Bob D Lewis | Nisland, SD 57762 | $19,003 |
37 | Wendt Ranches Inc | Newell, SD 57760 | $17,790 |
38 | Tom Deyoe | Newell, SD 57760 | $17,686 |
39 | J H Welling Trust | Chadron, NE 69337 | $17,632 |
40 | Jeff Horman | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $17,557 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”