Total Conservation Programs in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 308
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $15,627,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | B P M Corp | Middleton, ID 83644 | $97,801 |
42 | 96 Ranch LLC | Rapid City, SD 57709 | $96,926 |
43 | Dale H Gatzke | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $90,484 |
44 | Kenneth H Gatzke | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $90,483 |
45 | Lermeny Livestock Inc | Newell, SD 57760 | $89,397 |
46 | Dan E Olson | Newell, SD 57760 | $87,941 |
47 | Cindy Goeringer | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $86,462 |
48 | Louis W Kessel | Nisland, SD 57762 | $84,618 |
49 | James T Mcdermott | Newell, SD 57760 | $83,730 |
50 | Leo Ahonen | Newell, SD 57760 | $81,424 |
51 | Paul A Schummer | Helena, MT 59601 | $74,319 |
52 | Jerry Goeringer Living Trust | Sun City, AZ 85351 | $73,863 |
53 | Mary Goeringer Living Trust | Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 | $73,863 |
54 | Gotfredson Elm Creek Ranch | Newell, SD 57760 | $71,918 |
55 | Steven K Goff | Newell, SD 57760 | $71,700 |
56 | Richard Fabricius | Bethel, MN 55005 | $67,260 |
57 | Mecaha Cattle Co | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $63,099 |
58 | Alan E Shaykett | Nisland, SD 57762 | $58,794 |
59 | Catherine A Duffy | Fargo, ND 58103 | $56,707 |
60 | David Winkler | Newell, SD 57760 | $55,723 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”