Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butte County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 81
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $89,266 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rebecca J Boylan | Newell, SD 57760 | $8,241 |
2 | Jessica P Holmes | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $6,053 |
3 | Tyrel Lee Bonnet | Newell, SD 57760 | $4,770 |
4 | Denna Lindsey | Newell, SD 57760 | $3,993 |
5 | Teri Todd | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $3,663 |
6 | Ty A Ollerich | Newell, SD 57760 | $2,749 |
7 | Gail Schalesky-ginsbach | Newell, SD 57760 | $2,739 |
8 | John Latham | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $2,612 |
9 | Julie Ginsbach | Newell, SD 57760 | $2,162 |
10 | Debra Lee Deschamps | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,953 |
11 | Jennie Crowser | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,931 |
12 | Lela Bowen | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,893 |
13 | Mary Jacobsen | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,882 |
14 | Clayton James Mickelson | Nisland, SD 57762 | $1,708 |
15 | Joshua Kitzan | Nisland, SD 57762 | $1,699 |
16 | Dustin Braun | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,642 |
17 | Tyler J Fritz | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,583 |
18 | April Lane | Nisland, SD 57762 | $1,504 |
19 | Tyler David Hogen | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,311 |
20 | Graham Dean Lewis | Nisland, SD 57762 | $1,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>