Farm Subsidy information
Butte County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,713
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $142,650,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Goeringer | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $681,334 |
42 | Tom C Davis | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $672,375 |
43 | Brent Preslicka | Newell, SD 57760 | $669,625 |
44 | James Orwick | Newell, SD 57760 | $657,909 |
45 | Douglas Hohenberger | Newell, SD 57760 | $655,701 |
46 | Mary Jacobsen | Newell, SD 57760 | $611,966 |
47 | H L Brunner & Sons | Vale, SD 57788 | $609,423 |
48 | Kenneth D Hansen | Fruitdale, SD 57717 | $603,694 |
49 | Davis Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $584,729 |
50 | Cox Farms LLC | Vale, SD 57788 | $582,992 |
51 | Kenneth Carlsen | Bonesteel, SD 57317 | $578,858 |
52 | Richard J Greany | Newell, SD 57760 | $561,679 |
53 | Will Lantis | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $558,071 |
54 | Battle Creek Ranch Lllp | Billings, MT 59106 | $549,029 |
55 | Peter L Buer | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $543,627 |
56 | Mary Ellen Lantis | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $540,509 |
57 | Kathy Gatzke | Newell, SD 57760 | $523,632 |
58 | Guy Casteel | Newell, SD 57760 | $522,710 |
59 | Dale A Sprague | Mud Butte, SD 57758 | $521,406 |
60 | Dane Dobesh | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $510,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”