Conservation Reserve Program in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 490
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $1,962,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Grace Kostel | Aurora, NE 68818 | $20,094 |
22 | Charles Mix Conservation District | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $19,881 |
23 | Lloyd J Bakken | Platte, SD 57369 | $19,580 |
24 | Mardell F Uken | Centerville, SD 57014 | $18,724 |
25 | Brian M Soukup | Mc Cool Junction, NE 68401 | $17,390 |
26 | Linda J Pashby | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $16,376 |
27 | John A Boltjes | Platte, SD 57369 | $16,011 |
28 | South Dakota Parks & Wildlife Foundation | Pierre, SD 57501 | $15,844 |
29 | Kuipers Family Farms LLC | Wellington, CO 80549 | $15,764 |
30 | Greg A Vaughn | Decherd, TN 37324 | $15,738 |
31 | Wayne Louis Crosby | Platte, SD 57369 | $15,675 |
32 | Paul J Cimpl | Dante, SD 57329 | $15,457 |
33 | Janet M Evans | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $15,350 |
34 | Mary Catherine Hunt | Platte, SD 57369 | $15,259 |
35 | Evans Family Enterprises LLC | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $15,076 |
36 | Carol Lynn Kaberna Living Trust | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $14,640 |
37 | Kamm Partners LLC | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $14,448 |
38 | Cihak-janda Family L L C | Del Mar, CA 92014 | $13,919 |
39 | James A Soukup | Sioux City, IA 51104 | $13,368 |
40 | Channon Visscher | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $12,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”