Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $23,253 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Craig Lee Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $7,892 |
2 | Swee Incorporated | Burbank, SD 57010 | $3,074 |
3 | Ralph R Huebner | Howard, SD 57349 | $2,613 |
4 | Mark David Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $1,608 |
5 | Loren Ouellette | Burbank, SD 57010 | $1,050 |
6 | Wayne L Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $950 |
7 | Alfred Vitek | Gayville, SD 57031 | $750 |
8 | Stevan Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $605 |
9 | Daryl William Henriksen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $537 |
10 | Bottomland Farms, Inc | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $455 |
11 | Jeff Searles | Centerville, SD 57014 | $421 |
12 | Ione C Vogel | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $369 |
13 | Ronald Lynn Carlson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $331 |
14 | Robert Emmick | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $296 |
15 | Roland Charles Orr | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $285 |
16 | Ronald Lynn Nelson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $276 |
17 | Michael Todd Huth | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $264 |
18 | Andrew James Van Kekerix | Beresford, SD 57004 | $257 |
19 | William D Knutson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $245 |
20 | Erlan Millard Olson | Burbank, SD 57010 | $173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>