Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Clay County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 623
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $15,576,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tamara Montieth | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $42,397 |
22 | Reid Matthew Jensen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $42,282 |
23 | Mark Leonard Girard | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $42,148 |
24 | Justin Franklin Orr | Volin, SD 57072 | $41,172 |
25 | Plains Commerce Bank ** | Watertown, SD 57201 | $39,951 |
26 | Blind Creek Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $39,813 |
27 | Ricky Allen Wolfswinkel | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $38,363 |
28 | Nicholas John Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $38,142 |
29 | Richard Dustin Johnson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $36,732 |
30 | Charles Johnson III | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $36,392 |
31 | Craig Daryl Johnson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $35,683 |
32 | Jerome Allen Schmitz | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $35,309 |
33 | Mark David Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $35,156 |
34 | Michael Todd Huth | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $34,705 |
35 | Travis Patrick Mockler | Centerville, SD 57014 | $32,607 |
36 | Jonda Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $32,255 |
37 | Larry Wayne Hawley | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $31,580 |
38 | John T Lindstrom | Beresford, SD 57004 | $31,192 |
39 | Joseph Lawrence Hubert | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $31,108 |
40 | Timothy Thissell | Beresford, SD 57004 | $30,167 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”