Direct Payment Program in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,215
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $30,976,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Randall Alan Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $60,753 |
162 | William D Knutson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $60,348 |
163 | Logue Partnership | Volin, SD 57072 | $60,030 |
164 | Adam Michael Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $59,127 |
165 | Orin Lyal Abild | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $58,706 |
166 | Craig Lee Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $58,394 |
167 | Froggy Bottom LLC | Merrill, IA 51038 | $58,273 |
168 | David Allan Sundstrom | Beresford, SD 57004 | $57,906 |
169 | Allen Charles Holoch | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $57,730 |
170 | Duane Allan Johnson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $57,148 |
171 | Irene Fairley | Gayville, SD 57031 | $56,926 |
172 | Jeffrey Dean Heidebrecht | Beresford, SD 57004 | $56,629 |
173 | Southeast South Dakota Experiment Farm Corp | Beresford, SD 57004 | $56,605 |
174 | Wilfred Schmidt | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $56,435 |
175 | James H Sorensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $56,375 |
176 | Michael Ray Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $56,310 |
177 | Ronald Lynn Nelson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $56,310 |
178 | Kevin John Lynch | Burbank, SD 57010 | $55,851 |
179 | Riley T Armstrong | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $55,843 |
180 | Layton Lawrence Strom | Beresford, SD 57004 | $55,280 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”