Total Commodity Programs in Davison County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 390
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $5,332,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ivan P Bialas | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $32,222 |
42 | Theresa Mueller | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $32,027 |
43 | Mitchell Livestock Marketing LLC | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $32,015 |
44 | Kristina Jean Blindauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $31,983 |
45 | Chipp Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $31,764 |
46 | Darwin Everson | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $31,353 |
47 | Neal Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $30,526 |
48 | Neugebauer Brothers | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $30,308 |
49 | Richard Allen Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $30,177 |
50 | Michael C Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $29,488 |
51 | Barclay Kreth | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $29,456 |
52 | Kevin Frank Fergen | Dimock, SD 57331 | $29,007 |
53 | Ronald Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $28,536 |
54 | Matthew Lewis Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $28,465 |
55 | Ronald L Moller | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $28,409 |
56 | Matthew Urban Storm | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $27,383 |
57 | Jared Leon Storm | Ethan, SD 57334 | $27,173 |
58 | Ryan Charles Storm | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $27,172 |
59 | Monte Fristad | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $27,094 |
60 | Derek Mueller | Ethan, SD 57334 | $26,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”