Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 495
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, South Dakota totaled $17,631,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Blooming Valley Farm LLC | Corsica, SD 57328 | $310,720 |
2 | Kurt Dean Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $146,751 |
3 | Joel & Kirsti Muckey Living Trust | Geddes, SD 57342 | $142,768 |
4 | Kirstin Elise Muckey | Geddes, SD 57342 | $121,607 |
5 | Glenn Gerhard Storm | Corsica, SD 57328 | $102,893 |
6 | Craig Muntefering | Parkston, SD 57366 | $101,692 |
7 | Travis Ryan Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $98,377 |
8 | Travis Ewald Fink | Delmont, SD 57330 | $91,669 |
9 | Myron Lee Baanhofman | Stickney, SD 57375 | $81,408 |
10 | Terry Lee Goehring | Delmont, SD 57330 | $80,884 |
11 | Brenda Joy Baanhofman | Corsica, SD 57328 | $75,995 |
12 | Wade Steven Horstman | Parkston, SD 57366 | $74,443 |
13 | Cws Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $72,913 |
14 | Donald Fink | Delmont, SD 57330 | $72,169 |
15 | Todd Gerlach | Parkston, SD 57366 | $71,900 |
16 | Glen Clarence Moke | Corsica, SD 57328 | $68,592 |
17 | Zita Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $68,005 |
18 | Larry Ray Baanhofman | Corsica, SD 57328 | $67,726 |
19 | Chad James Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $67,545 |
20 | Joshua Jon Bialas | Parkston, SD 57366 | $62,342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>