Farm Subsidy information
Faulk County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Faulk County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,227
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Faulk County, South Dakota totaled $445,801,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dean Niederbaumer | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $1,606,517 |
22 | Craig J Huss | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $1,572,639 |
23 | Propork, LLC | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $1,561,346 |
24 | Douglas Larry Trefz | Onaka, SD 57466 | $1,555,033 |
25 | Steve Roseland | Seneca, SD 57473 | $1,554,066 |
26 | Beverly Ann Huss | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $1,525,276 |
27 | Hardie Farms Inc | Seneca, SD 57473 | $1,525,123 |
28 | Mary E Swanhorst | Chelsea, SD 57465 | $1,465,725 |
29 | Jane Niederbaumer | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $1,454,819 |
30 | Diane Gabler | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $1,442,947 |
31 | Bruce Edgar | Rockham, SD 57470 | $1,434,328 |
32 | Jeffrey J Mccloud | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $1,418,149 |
33 | Steven S Schilder And Mary A Schilder Lvg Rev Trst | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $1,412,367 |
34 | Lori Gutenkauf | Onaka, SD 57466 | $1,399,483 |
35 | Rebecca J Huss | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $1,365,175 |
36 | Allan Jay Steward | Chelsea, SD 57465 | $1,355,677 |
37 | Patrick C Bowar | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $1,338,399 |
38 | Dale William Holt | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $1,320,545 |
39 | Beyers Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $1,307,528 |
40 | David Gerard Holt | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $1,304,056 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”