Total Conservation Programs in Grant County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 823
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $36,893,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Norman Moldenhauer Estate | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $284,016 |
22 | Laverna Moldenhauer | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $280,359 |
23 | Mary Ann Niessink | Luverne, MN 56156 | $279,419 |
24 | Ryan L Steege | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $265,415 |
25 | Ann Marie Loeschke | Milbank, SD 57252 | $257,378 |
26 | Paul William Dummann | Summit, SD 57266 | $256,322 |
27 | Robert Roy Weber | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $249,176 |
28 | Marlin Schmidt | Marvin, SD 57251 | $244,017 |
29 | Donald Brink | Watertown, SD 57201 | $241,331 |
30 | Lee G Issendorf | Milbank, SD 57252 | $240,726 |
31 | Timothy Idean Miller | Milbank, SD 57252 | $236,571 |
32 | Grant Roberts Rural Water System Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $231,581 |
33 | Bruce Wayne Kneeland | Summit, SD 57266 | $228,163 |
34 | Allen R Richter | Ortley, SD 57256 | $224,308 |
35 | Myrtle Hay | Madison, MN 56256 | $221,248 |
36 | Joel Purdy | Summit, SD 57266 | $210,895 |
37 | August Adolph Peterson Estate | Milbank, SD 57252 | $204,232 |
38 | John Fox | Stockholm, SD 57264 | $202,696 |
39 | Gtv Land & Cattle Co | Watertown, SD 57201 | $202,554 |
40 | David Leroy Nelson | Summit, SD 57266 | $199,578 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”