Farm Subsidy information
Grant County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Grant County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,049
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $327,269,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Victory Farms LLC | Milbank, SD 57252 | $2,021,206 |
| 2 | Karels Farms Part | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,685,494 |
| 3 | Blake A Sime | Revillo, SD 57259 | $1,525,481 |
| 4 | Liebe Farms Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,473,987 |
| 5 | Thomas Lee Wollschlager | Strandburg, SD 57265 | $1,459,637 |
| 6 | E & M Farms Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,447,914 |
| 7 | Mielitz Bros Partnership | Bellingham, MN 56212 | $1,371,000 |
| 8 | Jeff S Schmidt | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $1,348,816 |
| 9 | Pauli Farms Inc | Big Stone City, SD 57216 | $1,303,934 |
| 10 | Norswiss Dairy Inc | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $1,293,473 |
| 11 | Russel W Howard | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,219,209 |
| 12 | A C Stengel And Sons Inc | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,214,967 |
| 13 | Todd Francis Keller | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $1,192,591 |
| 14 | Lakeside Dairy LLC | Ortley, SD 57256 | $1,181,190 |
| 15 | Alan Schneck | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,132,049 |
| 16 | Falk Farms Inc | South Shore, SD 57263 | $1,129,804 |
| 17 | Allen Amdahl | Summit, SD 57266 | $1,126,086 |
| 18 | D & J Farms | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,113,519 |
| 19 | Bruce Granquist | Milbank, SD 57252 | $1,088,110 |
| 20 | Ronald Ralph Anderson | Labolt, SD 57246 | $1,060,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf