Counter Cyclical Program in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 532
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $5,689,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bochek Stock Farms | Vienna, SD 57271 | $164,888 |
2 | Racota Valley Ranch | Hazel, SD 57242 | $152,787 |
3 | Clarmont Hutterian Brethren Inc | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $108,442 |
4 | Poinsett Hutterian Brethren Inc | Estelline, SD 57234 | $108,220 |
5 | J Anderson Farm Inc | Bryant, SD 57221 | $85,566 |
6 | Nathan N Lakness | Hayti, SD 57241 | $84,787 |
7 | Milton A Lakness | Hayti, SD 57241 | $79,629 |
8 | Leiseth Farms Inc | Hazel, SD 57242 | $77,319 |
9 | Roger John Fritz | Hazel, SD 57242 | $76,661 |
10 | Randall Davis Frederick | Hayti, SD 57241 | $75,534 |
11 | Dolph Creek Farms Inc | Bryant, SD 57221 | $72,387 |
12 | Joseph L Lakness | Hayti, SD 57241 | $60,360 |
13 | Terrance Lee Hilliard | Bryant, SD 57221 | $58,960 |
14 | Roe Farm LLC | Hazel, SD 57242 | $58,133 |
15 | Rinke Farms Llp | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $56,274 |
16 | Duane Alan Smith | Watertown, SD 57201 | $54,801 |
17 | Roger Michael Smith | Hazel, SD 57242 | $54,801 |
18 | Eugene Norman Fedt | Bryant, SD 57221 | $54,603 |
19 | Robert Edward Holzwarth | Hazel, SD 57242 | $52,738 |
20 | Anthony Greg Opdahl | Hazel, SD 57242 | $49,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>