Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Hand County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 238
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Hand County, South Dakota totaled $9,886,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Marlen Tim Winter | Saint Lawrence, SD 57373 | $74,543 |
42 | Steptoe Bros | Miller, SD 57362 | $74,444 |
43 | Nelson's Inc | Miller, SD 57362 | $72,882 |
44 | Randall C Schultz | Tulare, SD 57476 | $71,503 |
45 | Lori Fremark | Saint Lawrence, SD 57373 | $71,394 |
46 | Kent Douglas Reimann | Miller, SD 57362 | $71,295 |
47 | George M Schade | Redfield, SD 57469 | $70,546 |
48 | Carla Schade | Redfield, SD 57469 | $70,545 |
49 | Jeffrey Gene Parmely | Miller, SD 57362 | $68,191 |
50 | Thomas Morog | St Lawrence, SD 57373 | $66,936 |
51 | Renae Veskrna Morog | Saint Lawrence, SD 57373 | $66,936 |
52 | Maher Farms Inc | Zell, SD 57469 | $65,275 |
53 | Carol Grey | Saint Lawrence, SD 57373 | $62,765 |
54 | Kelvin Grey | Saint Lawrence, SD 57373 | $62,765 |
55 | Kolda Brothers | Orient, SD 57467 | $62,593 |
56 | Todd Bushong | Tulare, SD 57476 | $61,378 |
57 | Sally Nuhsbaumer | Zell, SD 57469 | $60,613 |
58 | Gerald Nuhsbaumer | Zell, SD 57469 | $60,613 |
59 | Dale Edward Hargens | Miller, SD 57362 | $59,995 |
60 | Schaffer Farms | Redfield, SD 57469 | $59,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”