Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Hyde County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 65
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Hyde County, South Dakota totaled $59,117 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenneth A Myers | Onida, SD 57564 | $1,025 |
22 | Donald W Binder | Highmore, SD 57345 | $1,022 |
23 | Larry Weidenbach Living Trust | Highmore, SD 57345 | $819 |
24 | K Lazy K Ranch Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $701 |
25 | Davis Brothers | Holabird, SD 57540 | $681 |
26 | Mark Mccloud | Highmore, SD 57345 | $652 |
27 | Bruce Mccloud Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $652 |
28 | Fawcetts Elm Creek Ranch | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $645 |
29 | Robert Arther Hanson | Highmore, SD 57345 | $642 |
30 | Lowell Rinehart | Highmore, SD 57345 | $641 |
31 | Noreen L Nickelson | Highmore, SD 57345 | $601 |
32 | Dittman Ranch Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $542 |
33 | Richard Knox | Highmore, SD 57345 | $521 |
34 | Quirk Ranch Ltd | Highmore, SD 57345 | $507 |
35 | Richard Kusser | Highmore, SD 57345 | $469 |
36 | Howard Hemminger | Highmore, SD 57345 | $463 |
37 | Dan Elwood | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $456 |
38 | Harold D Hinkle | Holabird, SD 57540 | $452 |
39 | Eleanor Steptoe | Miller, SD 57362 | $450 |
40 | Elton Vilhauer | Highmore, SD 57345 | $424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”