Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Hyde County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 227
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Hyde County, South Dakota totaled $8,144,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cowan Ranch Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $677,573 |
2 | Aesoph Farms LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $295,717 |
3 | Eagle Pass Ranch Lp | Highmore, SD 57345 | $275,616 |
4 | K Lazy K Ranch Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $256,878 |
5 | Leisinger Farms | Highmore, SD 57345 | $237,826 |
6 | Kroeplin Farms General Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $227,798 |
7 | Darwin Baloun Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $207,014 |
8 | Fawcetts Elm Creek Ranch | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $182,529 |
9 | Katherine Porter | Highmore, SD 57345 | $175,112 |
10 | Aesoph Brothers Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $173,190 |
11 | Charlie Bloomenrader | Highmore, SD 57345 | $136,018 |
12 | Solberg Farms Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $132,120 |
13 | Doug Knox | Highmore, SD 57345 | $116,795 |
14 | Daniel Knox | Highmore, SD 57345 | $116,773 |
15 | Simonson Farm Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $113,969 |
16 | Aesoph Ranch | Highmore, SD 57345 | $111,365 |
17 | Jeff Ellsworth | Highmore, SD 57345 | $107,304 |
18 | Quirk Ranch Ltd | Highmore, SD 57345 | $104,016 |
19 | Mary Knox | Highmore, SD 57345 | $100,665 |
20 | Jackie Knox | Highmore, SD 57345 | $100,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>