Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 343
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $3,595,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Norman Madison | Carthage, SD 57323 | $31,133 |
22 | Richard Clayton Abrahamson | Oldham, SD 57051 | $29,802 |
23 | Alan J Vedvei | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $28,580 |
24 | Gregory Lee Ward | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $28,290 |
25 | Brady Larsen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $27,038 |
26 | Brian Driscoll | De Smet, SD 57231 | $26,069 |
27 | Leroy Koehlmoos | De Smet, SD 57231 | $25,353 |
28 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $23,770 |
29 | Bryan Sneesby | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $23,522 |
30 | Poppen Farms Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $22,240 |
31 | Alan Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $22,184 |
32 | Kathy Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $22,184 |
33 | Rick Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $22,184 |
34 | Vicky Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $22,184 |
35 | Nicholas Todd Wilkinson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $20,437 |
36 | Raymond Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $20,294 |
37 | Steven Lyle Page | De Smet, SD 57231 | $19,828 |
38 | Clint D Hoyer | Winfred, SD 57076 | $19,507 |
39 | Jeffrey Madison | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $19,492 |
40 | Dennis Ranschau | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $19,382 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”