Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 138
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $1,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Whitewood Acres Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $13,313 |
22 | Jane Arlene Carlson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $11,949 |
23 | Pleasant Hill Farm | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $11,548 |
24 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $11,093 |
25 | Jeremy R Forbes | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,989 |
26 | Douglas Charles Meyer | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $8,839 |
27 | Abc Acres, LLC | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $6,937 |
28 | Allan Rieck | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $6,667 |
29 | Jensen Double J Farms | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $6,374 |
30 | Craig R Converse | Brookings, SD 57006 | $5,690 |
31 | Wertz Family Limited Partnership | Huron, SD 57350 | $5,641 |
32 | Ridgeview Limited Liability Company | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $5,559 |
33 | Robert Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $5,552 |
34 | Gregory Dale Josephsen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $5,204 |
35 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $4,972 |
36 | Bryson Ensz | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $4,860 |
37 | Ronald Chester Soren | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $4,448 |
38 | Catherine Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $4,351 |
39 | Jon Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $4,351 |
40 | Tom Miller | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $4,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”