Direct Payment Program in Lawrence County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 61
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Lawrence County, South Dakota totaled $169,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Billy J Evans | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $496 |
42 | Lorraine Kissack | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $484 |
43 | Melvin Seymour | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $447 |
44 | Jensen Ranch | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $424 |
45 | Fred Beets | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $328 |
46 | Timothy W Tetrault | Saint Onge, SD 57779 | $327 |
47 | Mark Frederickson | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $272 |
48 | Michael J Baker | Saint Onge, SD 57779 | $258 |
49 | Edward A Furois Revocable Trust | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $249 |
50 | Donald Hurm | Saint Onge, SD 57779 | $232 |
51 | Gene Johnny Johnson | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $208 |
52 | Gloria Delzer | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $202 |
53 | Anderson Bros | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $132 |
54 | Donald J Kissack | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $126 |
55 | Charles Edwards | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $96 |
56 | Warren N Golliher | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $60 |
57 | Daniel J Marrs | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $54 |
58 | Millers Crow Creek Ranch LLC | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $52 |
59 | Kate Leigh Crowley-johnson | Saint Onge, SD 57779 | $17 |
60 | Cris Miller | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $16 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”