Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,330
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $408,051,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Perry Layne Ambur | Beresford, SD 57004 | $879,778 |
42 | Darwin William Hazel | Beresford, SD 57004 | $870,756 |
43 | Tim Alan De Lay | Hudson, SD 57034 | $851,634 |
44 | Rodney Renback | Lennox, SD 57039 | $851,065 |
45 | Gregory Lee Slack | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $847,709 |
46 | Daryl Akland | Beresford, SD 57004 | $843,273 |
47 | Lloyd Hammerstrom | Lennox, SD 57039 | $835,183 |
48 | Dale Alan Geiken | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $834,314 |
49 | Michael Harley Eliason | Canton, SD 57013 | $817,263 |
50 | Leonard F Block Jr | Canton, SD 57013 | $808,985 |
51 | Robert Alan Evanson | Hudson, SD 57034 | $808,406 |
52 | Loren Eugene Knutson | Canton, SD 57013 | $800,664 |
53 | Glenn Dean Van Ningen | Lennox, SD 57039 | $799,407 |
54 | Gubbrud Farms Inc | Alcester, SD 57001 | $794,942 |
55 | Michael Gene Knutson | Canton, SD 57013 | $785,453 |
56 | Slack Farms | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $774,742 |
57 | Norman Arne Rasmussen | Hudson, SD 57034 | $762,820 |
58 | Mark Donald Javers | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $754,737 |
59 | Roman Joseph Suing | Worthing, SD 57077 | $751,795 |
60 | Jason Derek Van Den Top | Canton, SD 57013 | $747,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”