Farm Subsidy information
Lyman County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Lyman County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,972
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lyman County, South Dakota totaled $472,823,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $6,772,847 |
2 | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $5,353,383 |
3 | Karlen Ranch | Reliance, SD 57569 | $5,108,595 |
4 | Stanley Grain Inc | Presho, SD 57568 | $2,634,583 |
5 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,457,130 |
6 | Sd Building Authority | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $2,334,979 |
7 | Taylor Ranch Inc | Presho, SD 57568 | $2,312,935 |
8 | Todd P Taylor | Presho, SD 57568 | $2,303,597 |
9 | Steve Thomas | Presho, SD 57568 | $2,294,643 |
10 | Donald Schindler | Reliance, SD 57569 | $2,095,505 |
11 | Carl Brakke | Presho, SD 57568 | $2,025,886 |
12 | Bonnie Schindler | Reliance, SD 57569 | $1,961,632 |
13 | Karlen Family Partnership | Reliance, SD 57569 | $1,954,842 |
14 | Mundlein Bros | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $1,887,716 |
15 | Scott W Terca | Presho, SD 57568 | $1,886,030 |
16 | Ehlers Farms Inc | Presho, SD 57568 | $1,863,353 |
17 | James W Anderson | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $1,824,145 |
18 | Doug J Perry | Vivian, SD 57576 | $1,787,440 |
19 | Schindler Ag Partnership | Reliance, SD 57569 | $1,751,996 |
20 | Cody J Hoffman | Presho, SD 57568 | $1,751,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>