Total Commodity Programs in McCook County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 541
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in McCook County, South Dakota totaled $5,973,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gerald Eichacker | Salem, SD 57058 | $46,726 |
22 | Tusha Ag Inc | Emery, SD 57332 | $45,661 |
23 | K & W Farm Inc | Marion, SD 57043 | $45,518 |
24 | Michael David Wise | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $45,129 |
25 | Golden View Hutterian Brethren Inc | Salem, SD 57058 | $44,959 |
26 | David E Even | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $44,504 |
27 | Smith Farms Inc | Montrose, SD 57048 | $43,571 |
28 | Gene Hofer | Bridgewater, SD 57319 | $43,317 |
29 | Craig A Blindert | Salem, SD 57058 | $42,467 |
30 | Patrick H Bartmann | Montrose, SD 57048 | $40,949 |
31 | Shumaker Farms Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $39,354 |
32 | Donald Allan Larson | Canistota, SD 57012 | $39,338 |
33 | Gary Schallenkamp | Bridgewater, SD 57319 | $38,798 |
34 | Barney Joseph Roling | Salem, SD 57058 | $38,503 |
35 | Tschetter Farms Partnership | Bridgewater, SD 57319 | $38,196 |
36 | Jason Hofer | Bridgewater, SD 57319 | $38,174 |
37 | Salem Farms LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $37,709 |
38 | Norman Peterson | Montrose, SD 57048 | $37,234 |
39 | Bernard D Stockwell | Parker, SD 57053 | $37,015 |
40 | George Bernard Weber | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $36,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”