Conservation Reserve Program in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,178
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $102,788,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | The Spot Incorporated Of Britton | Britton, SD 57430 | $479,958 |
42 | Triple J Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $474,646 |
43 | Oscar Oland | Glendale, AZ 85307 | $471,931 |
44 | Neil Foote | Langford, SD 57454 | $469,629 |
45 | Randall Charles Moeckly | Britton, SD 57430 | $467,871 |
46 | Terrence Henry Jaspers | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $465,447 |
47 | Grimsrud Ranch Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $459,819 |
48 | Ivin C Quamen | Britton, SD 57430 | $459,608 |
49 | Royal Jerde | Langford, SD 57454 | $458,589 |
50 | Bessler Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $454,601 |
51 | Larry Schuster | Eden, SD 57232 | $452,684 |
52 | Ksp Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $447,350 |
53 | Herbert A Jensen | Langford, SD 57454 | $444,402 |
54 | Marvin Ernst Beck | Hecla, SD 57446 | $434,125 |
55 | Neil E Patterson | Pinckney, MI 48169 | $432,131 |
56 | La Mirada Limited Partnership | Lake City, SD 57247 | $429,026 |
57 | La Mirada Limited Partnership II | Lake City, SD 57247 | $428,010 |
58 | C Craig Tisher | Gainesville, FL 32605 | $428,007 |
59 | Candie Beck | Hecla, SD 57446 | $425,956 |
60 | Lonnie Jones | Claremont, SD 57432 | $424,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”