Production Flexibility Program in Marshall County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 723
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Marshall County, South Dakota totaled $18,169,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Penrhos Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $278,727 |
2 | Newport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $277,032 |
3 | Sunset Colony | Britton, SD 57430 | $272,208 |
4 | Malm & Cole Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $262,691 |
5 | D & M Partnership | Amherst, SD 57421 | $262,056 |
6 | Westwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $234,526 |
7 | Peter Paul Bremmon | Britton, SD 57430 | $232,613 |
8 | Ksp Farms Inc | Langford, SD 57454 | $214,805 |
9 | Gary Zuehlke | Britton, SD 57430 | $214,182 |
10 | Nickeson Farms Inc | Veblen, SD 57270 | $202,674 |
11 | David Lynn Docter | Lake City, SD 57247 | $199,181 |
12 | Clark Moeckly | Britton, SD 57430 | $193,137 |
13 | Dalton Docter Feedlot Inc | Amherst, SD 57421 | $185,280 |
14 | William J Kadoun | Britton, SD 57430 | $170,579 |
15 | Randall Charles Moeckly | Britton, SD 57430 | $164,222 |
16 | James Edward Peters | Britton, SD 57430 | $158,361 |
17 | Triple J Farms Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $156,193 |
18 | Charles Kirk Rabenberg | Britton, SD 57430 | $147,600 |
19 | D M J Erickson | Langford, SD 57454 | $138,906 |
20 | Kim Delvin Stiegelmeier | Britton, SD 57430 | $136,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>